The Frankenstein Application Essay
For this assignment you will write your Frankenstein1 application essay. You are required to
submit only your final draft for this assignment though we encourage all students to take
advantage of the additional feedback a draft can provide. Use grader feedback, along with the
course lessons and your own ideas, to revise your optional draft prior to submitting the
required final copy.
Literary works like Frankenstein explore the “human condition” or experiences that humans
encounter. The study guides for Frankenstein offer several “Real Life Considerations” meant to
help you critically analyze the applications of the work’s themes in today’s world. Now, you will
choose one of these topics and explore it using secondary resources to learn more about the
novel and its relevant social topics. You might find information about social issues in familiar
sources such as magazines, newspapers, or social science journals. Make sure your sources are
credible—you do not want a random website or an encyclopedic website such as Wikipedia.2
Your sources will preferably be a scholarly ones. Here are some ideas of places where you might
find appropriate sources for this assignment:

Mark Joe
Composition II
Frankenstein Application Essay
January 23, 2019
Nature Vs. Nurture in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein
For a considerable length of time, there has been tremendous debate about whether inherited traits or natural impacts may influence one’s identity, personality, and conduct. While it is unmistakable that physical attributes are genetic by nature, nurture is for the most part related to the treatment one receives by one’s surroundings. Both Nature and Nurture are significant in the development of Frankenstein’s monster in Mary Shelley’s classic. From the start of life, nature and nurture have affected every single living thing’s adaptation, life, and survival. The natural characteristics that life forms acquire during childbirth, or inception represents Nature while nurture stands in for the characteristics that creatures gain from association with the society. In Shelley’s Frankenstein, she depicts the topic of nature versus nurture through her portrayal of her characters, the setting of her story, and incongruity, so as to demonstrate that Victor Frankenstein’s monster would not have been that had the society not forced him to evolve as such.
It is a conviction that one can never have a serene and agreeable position on life and humanity when even one’s own parent or maker abandons one. At the start of Shelley’s work, Victor Frankenstein starts performs an unnatural experiment and creates life, only to abandon his creation; one he had formerly been so fixated on. In the wake of spending months drudging over the creation of his prodigy, it springs up at long last, but as opposed to being happy and pleased, Frankenstein is startled by what he sees and rejects the creature that so frantically needs him. He deserts the monster because he is disgusted with its deformations and hence, instigates the monster’s rule of terror against its maker’s family. Since Victor Frankenstein declines to have any association with his creation, the creature in itself is quickly hesitant to trust anyone and is thus forced to get acquainted with the machinations of life all alone. “It is tossed into a universe of misconception and bias.” (Badalamenti 419) It is brought to life, with all the attributes of every other baby, hungry for attention and requiring care and love. It approaches other people with expectations of being acknowledged. However, he is thrown out and rejected. It does not seem to comprehend this, and is dejected and hurt by the events that occur. In spite of the fact that he is referred to by the audience and readers of Shelley’s book as the monster, it obviously did not start down that road from birth.
Different from Victor Frankenstein, the monster yearns for acknowledgment and company from the society. The monster is more sympathizing and enthusiastic than its creator (Hobbler). In the aftermath of the brutal treatment it gets from the town, it stows away in a family’s ranch. The monster considers this family and exudes hints of care. Then again, as is oft the case, the monster shows itself to this family he respects so incredibly, and is stoned at and dismissed. It is at this point that he pronounces war against humanity. The notion Shelley brings to play is the evidence that the creature was not brought into the world a monster; “it was not his nature at inception,” (Pollin 98) till the point when the society declined to nurture him and pushed him to his limit.
One last but imperative angle in the topic of nature versus nurture is the diverse cluster of incongruity incorporated into the book. Despite the fact that it would be required for Victor Frankenstein to assume full liability for his activities and to endeavor to address the issue, he doesn’t. Truth be told, he sees himself as a victim, to be acquitted of all blame. “I felt as though I had carried out some great crime, the awareness of which haunted me. I was guiltless, however I had surely drawn an awful revile upon my head, as mortal as that of a crime” (Shelley 158). Evidently, it is absurd, even laughable, that he does not think that he ought to be at fault for the death of Elizabeth, his wife, who the monster had killed in retribution for his abandonment. In the event that he had catered for his creation and brought it up legitimately, it could be argued that there would have been no unfortunate casualties and thusly, nothing to assume any fault for.
In conclusion, the author demonstrates the topic of nature versus nurture utilizing different strategies all through her book. It was the underlying dismissal of the monster’s maker that prompted its hunger for the retribution of the injustice which he had faced from his environment. In the event that the monster was treated with fairness by the society, or better still, accepted and properly raised by his creator, it most probably would never have turned into the monster it is being seen as by the reader. Every living being normally requires some form of attention, care and nurture, regardless of its nature, in order to become the best version of itself. Frankenstein proves that Nature and nurture assume paramount roles in each and every creature’s life, even those too ugly to set eyes upon. 
Works Cited
Badalamenti, Anthony. “Why did Mary Shelley Write Frankenstein”. Journal of Religion and Health. 2006. 45: 419–439.
Hobbler, Dorthy and Thomas. The Monsters: Mary Shelley and the Curse of Frankenstein. Back Bay Books, 2007.
Pollin, Burton. “Philisophical and Literary Sources of Frankenstein”. Comparative Literature. 1965. 17: 97–108.
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. Oxford World’s Classics ed. New York: Oxford UP, 1998. Print.